Higher acceptance length, slower prose: Ling’s n=1/2/3 MTP test on one Spark

Excerpt

The missing control is visible in sudoingX’s Ling-3.0-flash benchmark graphics. The earlier table leaves Ling’s no-speculation baseline as “not measured.” The later code/prose graphic fills it in: about 23 tok/s without the drafter, against 40.9 on code and 38.7 on prose with MTP n=1, at short prompts. That makes the tuning claim easier to inspect. The later graphic compares short code and prose workloads with and without drafting. A separate correction in the repository isolates CUDA graphs: th