NeurIPS reject -> ICLR: How much reviewer feedback are you actually implementing ? [D]

Excerpt

Welp, NeurIPS is a wrap for those of us who got rejected 😭 Off we go to ICLR or whatever the next venue is, hopefully after making some meaningful changes to the paper. For people who are resubmitting, I’m curious: how much of the NeurIPS reviewer feedback are you actually implementing? Did you try to address basically everything the reviewers brought up, or are you being selective and only making changes where you think the criticism is valid/useful? I’m curious about papers that got questioned