Adding logit penalty for "wait", "maybe" and "perhaps" to Qwen models improves their accuracy

Excerpt

Meta came out with a banger paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.00206 , but it did not look at various quantizations supported in llama.cpp. So I did a run on 50 random MATH-500 questions ( https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/MATH-500 ) and ran it on various quantizations of https://huggingface.co/bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF and tried --logit-bias 466-2 --logit-bias 694-2 --logit-bias 1362-2 \ --logit-bias 1412-2 --logit-bias 1921-2 --logit-bias 1990-2 \ --logit-bias 2086-2 --logit-bia